Privacy
By design, not by promise.
Encryption happens on your device before anything leaves it. A block on someone else's node is meaningless alone. No operator, including the project, holds a key.
People · Nodes · Trust
RAIN is a bio-inspired storage network: your files are split into encrypted fragments and spread across a village of ordinary always-on devices, so no single failure — and no single company — can lose, read, or withhold them.
Fig. 1 — the architecture
Illustration only — node count and links are schematic. The worked example in the text (nine blocks, any six) is the paper's r = 1.5.
A play on RAID, at the scale of a town. A file is cut into K = r·N erasure-coded blocks, and any N of them rebuild it; at the paper's ratio of r = 1.5, a file kept as twelve blocks survives losing any four. Blocks live in a village of K nodes that trade storage with each other — each node contributing a fixed share (the paper models Z = 100 GB per node). Nodes watch each other's availability through Merkle-tree hashes on a shared ledger; when too many blocks go dark, the village regenerates them on its own.
In the paper's model, a village of 36 nodes gives a file an expected lifetime on the order of the age of the Earth.
Privacy
Encryption happens on your device before anything leaves it. A block on someone else's node is meaningless alone. No operator, including the project, holds a key.
Resilience
The early Internet's protocols allowed redundancy, self-repair, and self-organization: single nodes fail, new ones join, the whole keeps working. RAIN brings that resilience — the paper calls it rooted in ecology — back to where data actually lives.
Sustainability
More than 3% of the world's power consumption goes to data centers, and it is rising. Storage on low-energy devices that are already on, already in homes, adds almost nothing.
The doctrine
Every cloud sells security: firewalls, audits, certifications. All of it defends the company that holds your data. RAIN is built so that no operator can read, lose, rewrite, or withhold what you store. Privacy is not a policy here. It is the architecture.
The paper puts it as an ownership question: move the power of global trusted third parties to local citizens and businesses. The same network can carry what those third parties sell today — telecommunication, content delivery, cryptocurrency, and the distributed administration of a town or a region.
What it's for
RAIN is not a product; it is the ground a product stands on. The first application is deliberately small and concrete. The program behind it — the services the paper lists, run by the people who use them — is not.
Built · first instance
Intake screening against public court and corrections records, a review queue before anything touches a file, and an append-only event log — every action recorded, none rewritable. Designed for a New Mexico legal office. No SSNs, ever.
Proof of concept · [STATUS]Proposed
The request, the response, and the case file on the same substrate — so the record of who asked for what outlives the office that answered.
[STATUS]Proposed
Scanned records, deeds, and institutional memory held across independent nodes instead of one vendor's disk — custody a family, a firm, or a county can actually keep.
[STATUS]Proposed
The end state argued in the Northern Lights paper: civic systems whose records cannot be quietly altered, and whose owners are the people they serve.
[STATUS]Reading
Paper · 2017
Monti & Rasmussen. Artificial Life 23(4), 552–557. MIT Press.
Paper · in progress
[PLACEHOLDER — public trust in cyberspace; Section V: AI + RAIN as the end state. Title, authors, and abstract to follow.]
Cited in the paper, and the lineage behind it
People
Run a node
Nodes are ordinary devices that are already on. Yours stores encrypted fragments of your neighbors' data; theirs store yours.